Search
Close this search box.
Get unlimited local news and information that matters to you.

State: Rands couldn’t rule fairly on specific motion in DUI cases

‘Kitsap motion’ argues breath test evidence is inadmissible

The front entrance of Whatcom County District Court as a person opens the glass door to walk in.
The Whatcom County Prosecuting Attorney's Office initially filed 50 affidavits of prejudice against newly elected District Court Judge Jonathan Rands because of his history with a specific kind of motion in his capacity as a defense attorney, as well as comments he made early into his tenure, according to court documents. (Kyle Tubbs/Cascadia Daily News)
By Audra Anderson Assistant Editor
Comments made by newly elected Whatcom County District Court Judge Jonathan Rands shortly after he took office Jan. 9 made the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office question his ability to rule fairly on a specific kind of motion used in DUI cases, according to court documents. It prompted a move by the prosecuting attorney's office to bar Rands from hearing 123 cases.  Prior to being elected judge, Rands had a successful private practice specializing in DUI cases. In November 2022, while Rand

Try us out

Enjoy 24 hours of unlimited digital access to CascadiaDaily.com for just $1!

Unlock the paywall

Browse our subscription offers Already a subscriber? Log in

Latest stories

Clayton Du Bois remains in the custody of Whatcom County Jail
Aug. 30, 2024 1:26 p.m.
State says violations went unaddressed since 2022
Aug. 30, 2024 1:03 p.m.
Nearly all districts see cuts; three see enrollment decline
Aug. 29, 2024 10:00 p.m.

Have a news tip?

Email newstips@cascadiadaily.com or Call/Text 360-922-3092

Subscribe to our free newsletters